Comments on: Kathryn Cramer Is Oppressed! http://geekfeminism.org/2009/09/16/kathryn-cramer-is-oppressed/ Women, feminism, and geek culture Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:41:49 +0000 hourly 1 By: Bene http://geekfeminism.org/2009/09/16/kathryn-cramer-is-oppressed/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Bene Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:45:22 +0000 http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1007#comment-976 She's flounced on it--did anyone get a screencap? (This is what I get for not being prompt.) She’s flounced on it–did anyone get a screencap? (This is what I get for not being prompt.)

]]> By: Skud http://geekfeminism.org/2009/09/16/kathryn-cramer-is-oppressed/comment-page-1/#comment-966 Skud Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:54:06 +0000 http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1007#comment-966 Testing followup comments by email -- ignore! Testing followup comments by email — ignore!

]]> By: Leigh Honeywell http://geekfeminism.org/2009/09/16/kathryn-cramer-is-oppressed/comment-page-1/#comment-965 Leigh Honeywell Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:51:56 +0000 http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1007#comment-965 Wait wait - is it not possible do have both a theoretical perspective on one's oppression as well as having been punched by cops? I must have missed that memo. *sigh* -Leigh Wait wait – is it not possible do have both a theoretical perspective on one’s oppression as well as having been punched by cops?

I must have missed that memo.

*sigh*

-Leigh

]]> By: Emily http://geekfeminism.org/2009/09/16/kathryn-cramer-is-oppressed/comment-page-1/#comment-964 Emily Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:46:50 +0000 http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1007#comment-964 Oh Tempest, what the HELL? She's just crazy. Oh Tempest, what the HELL? She’s just crazy.

]]> By: cofax http://geekfeminism.org/2009/09/16/kathryn-cramer-is-oppressed/comment-page-1/#comment-963 cofax Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:48:37 +0000 http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1007#comment-963 ... Well, at least she spelled "oppressed" properly this time? I can't even bring myself to follow your link, since it's going to be full of willful misrepresentation of other people's posts (without links thus placing them out of context), aggressive cluelessness, paranoid conviction of victimhood, failure of perspective, refusal to acknowledge the existence of white/het/cis/abled privilege, and namedropping. Hell with that. I do hope the Wiscon ProgComm will recognize the spirit in which her suggestion is offered -- in which case, it'll be roundfiled or rewritten to be worthwhile. …

Well, at least she spelled “oppressed” properly this time?

I can’t even bring myself to follow your link, since it’s going to be full of willful misrepresentation of other people’s posts (without links thus placing them out of context), aggressive cluelessness, paranoid conviction of victimhood, failure of perspective, refusal to acknowledge the existence of white/het/cis/abled privilege, and namedropping. Hell with that.

I do hope the Wiscon ProgComm will recognize the spirit in which her suggestion is offered — in which case, it’ll be roundfiled or rewritten to be worthwhile.

]]>