<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pink sparkly linkspam (November 16th, 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/</link>
	<description>Women, feminism, and geek culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Honeywell</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Honeywell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>added to the next linkspam, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>added to the next linkspam, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brinstar</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2749</link>
		<dc:creator>Brinstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2749</guid>
		<description>A couple of my gamer friends have linked the following:

A post discussing how playing a female character in Dragon Age: Origins is distinct from playing a male character: http://melindabardon.com/?p=51</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of my gamer friends have linked the following:</p>
<p>A post discussing how playing a female character in Dragon Age: Origins is distinct from playing a male character: <a href="http://melindabardon.com/?p=51" rel="nofollow">http://melindabardon.com/?p=51</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koipond</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>koipond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>Gotta have the alliteration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta have the alliteration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From comments: FoolishOwl on those pesky distractions &#124; Geek Feminism Blog</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>From comments: FoolishOwl on those pesky distractions &#124; Geek Feminism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>[...] commented: I looked at Gail Carmichael’s blog post, “Quick Thoughts on Pregnancy and Grad School,” and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commented: I looked at Gail Carmichael’s blog post, “Quick Thoughts on Pregnancy and Grad School,” and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Honeywell</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Honeywell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a 101 question at all, but sadly nor do I have an answer to it.  Your comment immediately brought to mind Paul Graham&#039;s essay &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/makersschedule.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Maker&#039;s Schedule, Manager&#039;s Schedule&lt;/a&gt;&quot; from a few weeks back.

I&#039;d love to read a further essay - Maker&#039;s Schedule, Manager&#039;s Schedule, Mother&#039;s Schedule.  But I&#039;m not the one to write it.  And really, it should be Parent&#039;s Schedule - but that lacks in alliteration :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a 101 question at all, but sadly nor do I have an answer to it.  Your comment immediately brought to mind Paul Graham&#8217;s essay &#8220;<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/makersschedule.html" rel="nofollow">Maker&#8217;s Schedule, Manager&#8217;s Schedule</a>&#8221; from a few weeks back.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to read a further essay &#8211; Maker&#8217;s Schedule, Manager&#8217;s Schedule, Mother&#8217;s Schedule.  But I&#8217;m not the one to write it.  And really, it should be Parent&#8217;s Schedule &#8211; but that lacks in alliteration :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>FoolishOwl&#039;s question has now formed the basis of a post: http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/17/from-comments-foolishowl-on-those-pesky-distractions/ so if you want to comment head on over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FoolishOwl&#8217;s question has now formed the basis of a post: <a href="http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/17/from-comments-foolishowl-on-those-pesky-distractions/" rel="nofollow">http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/17/from-comments-foolishowl-on-those-pesky-distractions/</a> so if you want to comment head on over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Honeywell</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Honeywell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>so much &lt;3 for grace :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much &lt;3 for grace :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FoolishOwl</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>FoolishOwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>I looked at Gail Carmichael&#039;s blog post, &quot;Quick Thoughts on Pregnancy and Grad School,&quot; and was immediately struck by how the women commenting on it were in general agreement, based on careful thought about the optimal moment to have children. It struck me by contrast with some &quot;how to be a good programmer&quot; essays I&#039;d read lately, written by men, which emphasized the importance of discipline and concentration on programming, and eliminating all distractions from one&#039;s life.

It&#039;s striking me that the emphasis on monomaniacal concentration only works on an implicit assumption of privilege -- that important matters other than programming will be handled by someone else.

I find it all too easy to lapse into such an attitude.

At the risk of asking a Feminism 101 question, what&#039;s a better way to balance these things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at Gail Carmichael&#8217;s blog post, &#8220;Quick Thoughts on Pregnancy and Grad School,&#8221; and was immediately struck by how the women commenting on it were in general agreement, based on careful thought about the optimal moment to have children. It struck me by contrast with some &#8220;how to be a good programmer&#8221; essays I&#8217;d read lately, written by men, which emphasized the importance of discipline and concentration on programming, and eliminating all distractions from one&#8217;s life.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s striking me that the emphasis on monomaniacal concentration only works on an implicit assumption of privilege &#8212; that important matters other than programming will be handled by someone else.</p>
<p>I find it all too easy to lapse into such an attitude.</p>
<p>At the risk of asking a Feminism 101 question, what&#8217;s a better way to balance these things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koipond</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>koipond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>Grace would say that reading comments is probably not a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grace would say that reading comments is probably not a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asad</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2009/11/16/pink-sparkly-linkspam/comment-page-1/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Asad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=1625#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>I dunno if this has been covered here yet but &lt;a href=&quot;http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:2Af2hzZ1rNoJ:genericresearch.livejournal.com/+genericresearch+survey&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is a Google cache of a rather SurveyFailish survey, hmm, eh?  Get it while it&#039;s cached, as the original has been obliterated.  I&#039;m guessing that we should be expecting &lt;i&gt;Rule 34&lt;/i&gt; on the shelves any month now, give or take a year or three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno if this has been covered here yet but <a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:2Af2hzZ1rNoJ:genericresearch.livejournal.com/+genericresearch+survey&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">here</a> is a Google cache of a rather SurveyFailish survey, hmm, eh?  Get it while it&#8217;s cached, as the original has been obliterated.  I&#8217;m guessing that we should be expecting <i>Rule 34</i> on the shelves any month now, give or take a year or three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
