<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing with women&#8217;s boundaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/</link>
	<description>Women, feminism, and geek culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 08:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I usually just play as a male and largely keep to myself in such environments to avoid all that shit. When I do play with others, it&#039;s usually those who get very into character, and I&#039;ve encountered little if any obvious sexism/harassment in those circles, as opposed to people who suddenly start asking me about my bra size (who are probably mostly 12-year-old boys who don&#039;t have a clue what that would mean IRL anyways).

Incidentally, you said we &quot;didn&#039;t want to know&quot; what your teacher wanted you to use for HTML - but if that happens to be Microsoft Word, did you know that Word is actually factory-set as the default HTML editor in the last couple of iterations of Microsoft Windows that I used? I don&#039;t want to sound like a Mac/Linux fangirl or start an OS war, but that was the tipping point for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I usually just play as a male and largely keep to myself in such environments to avoid all that shit. When I do play with others, it&#8217;s usually those who get very into character, and I&#8217;ve encountered little if any obvious sexism/harassment in those circles, as opposed to people who suddenly start asking me about my bra size (who are probably mostly 12-year-old boys who don&#8217;t have a clue what that would mean IRL anyways).</p>
<p>Incidentally, you said we &#8220;didn&#8217;t want to know&#8221; what your teacher wanted you to use for HTML &#8211; but if that happens to be Microsoft Word, did you know that Word is actually factory-set as the default HTML editor in the last couple of iterations of Microsoft Windows that I used? I don&#8217;t want to sound like a Mac/Linux fangirl or start an OS war, but that was the tipping point for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lampdevil</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Lampdevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>If this sort of things happens in MUDs and the SCA, it happens in D&amp;D groups and LARP troupes and MMORPG guilds and anywhere that gamers gather to game. It&#039;s not a symptom of the setting, so much as a manifestation of the worse parts of the overall culture.  A woman&#039;s &quot;no&quot; just means &quot;try harder&quot; and a woman&#039;s &quot;go away I don&#039;t like you&quot; is entirely disregarded.  And that&#039;s if the pressure to live up to one&#039;s socialization to &quot;be nice&quot; and not hurt anyone&#039;s feelings doesn&#039;t silence that &quot;no&quot; entirely.  The anonymity or pseudo-anonymity that the Internet grants gives different tools to work with, but the end results are much the same.

The &quot;temptation to be mean&quot; that you&#039;ve cited means that some otherwise sedate folk will become nasty trolls.  This cuts across gender lines. I&#039;ve seen plenty of female trolls and hatemongers in my time.  Though it&#039;s interesting that Standard Nasty Troll Vernacular seems to contain a lot of mysogynistic stuff, even when they&#039;re not specifically setting out to be sexist.  If the Internet can make people manifest the worst bits of themselves because they think no one is watching, then I&#039;m really scared that &lt;I&gt;so many people&lt;/i&gt; have inner thought processes that contain this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this sort of things happens in MUDs and the SCA, it happens in D&amp;D groups and LARP troupes and MMORPG guilds and anywhere that gamers gather to game. It&#8217;s not a symptom of the setting, so much as a manifestation of the worse parts of the overall culture.  A woman&#8217;s &#8220;no&#8221; just means &#8220;try harder&#8221; and a woman&#8217;s &#8220;go away I don&#8217;t like you&#8221; is entirely disregarded.  And that&#8217;s if the pressure to live up to one&#8217;s socialization to &#8220;be nice&#8221; and not hurt anyone&#8217;s feelings doesn&#8217;t silence that &#8220;no&#8221; entirely.  The anonymity or pseudo-anonymity that the Internet grants gives different tools to work with, but the end results are much the same.</p>
<p>The &#8220;temptation to be mean&#8221; that you&#8217;ve cited means that some otherwise sedate folk will become nasty trolls.  This cuts across gender lines. I&#8217;ve seen plenty of female trolls and hatemongers in my time.  Though it&#8217;s interesting that Standard Nasty Troll Vernacular seems to contain a lot of mysogynistic stuff, even when they&#8217;re not specifically setting out to be sexist.  If the Internet can make people manifest the worst bits of themselves because they think no one is watching, then I&#8217;m really scared that <i>so many people</i> have inner thought processes that contain this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Miller</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3732</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3732</guid>
		<description>I wondered if you would let this through.  I am sorry that what I was trying to state was not well worded. I am new in my attempt to learn more about feminism, and I thank you for explaining by PHMT.

I guess that I was wondering if the issue is bigger than an issue of patriarchy.  Are multiple issues at play?  For example, when people are given anonymity on the internet, the temptation to be mean is there.  Not everyone caves into that temptation.  But some people do.  Is this an issue of patriarchy, or are all people prone to be mean when given anonymity?  In addition to anonymity, you have the issue that arises within small organizations where people take the little power that they have and use it to create as much drama as possible.  

Now that I think about it, many of the MUD issues are like Society of Creative Anachronism issues except with the SCA people are not hiding behind a computer screen, but sometimes they can still be fairly anonymous and hide behind a given persona.  I didn&#039;t notice a large gender imbalance within the SCA as I noticed within the MUDs.  But the type of drama seemed similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if you would let this through.  I am sorry that what I was trying to state was not well worded. I am new in my attempt to learn more about feminism, and I thank you for explaining by PHMT.</p>
<p>I guess that I was wondering if the issue is bigger than an issue of patriarchy.  Are multiple issues at play?  For example, when people are given anonymity on the internet, the temptation to be mean is there.  Not everyone caves into that temptation.  But some people do.  Is this an issue of patriarchy, or are all people prone to be mean when given anonymity?  In addition to anonymity, you have the issue that arises within small organizations where people take the little power that they have and use it to create as much drama as possible.  </p>
<p>Now that I think about it, many of the MUD issues are like Society of Creative Anachronism issues except with the SCA people are not hiding behind a computer screen, but sometimes they can still be fairly anonymous and hide behind a given persona.  I didn&#8217;t notice a large gender imbalance within the SCA as I noticed within the MUDs.  But the type of drama seemed similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>Sorry for not replying earlier.

I agree with Jacinta. That&#039;s the entire point of why I wrote that -- it&#039;s something that deserves recognition, especially since it is still an issue.

I&#039;m certainly not so naive to think that a mere 5 years later this is a thing of the past -- the internets continually prove to me that it isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for not replying earlier.</p>
<p>I agree with Jacinta. That&#8217;s the entire point of why I wrote that &#8212; it&#8217;s something that deserves recognition, especially since it is still an issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not so naive to think that a mere 5 years later this is a thing of the past &#8212; the internets continually prove to me that it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacinta Reid</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacinta Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3704</guid>
		<description>Just from my perspective as a reader of this blog, let me say that I want to hear what you have to say. 

Stating your situation does not seem like a derail, more like a supporting data point that indicates that the kind of thing discussed in the article is a real, live, ongoing problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just from my perspective as a reader of this blog, let me say that I want to hear what you have to say. </p>
<p>Stating your situation does not seem like a derail, more like a supporting data point that indicates that the kind of thing discussed in the article is a real, live, ongoing problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eivind</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>Eivind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>Seen similar stuff on Ancient Anguish, a mud I used to frequent. The thing is, most muds don&#039;t really have a system of government, much less a thought-trough way of dealing with trouble-makers, particularily not those who create trouble that cross over into the real world.

So, instead, it comes down to something approaching random chance; it depends on if the top deities are sane, or not.

If they know what&#039;s good for the mud, they refuse to accept succh behaviour though, because as you point out, most muds are heavily male-dominated, which again means that the muds who -do- manage to have a female-friendly atmosphere, and thus more female players, get a lot more players of BOTH sexes.

More females, because of the friendlier atmosphere, and more males because many males will prefer playing in a more mixed environment. Win-Win if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen similar stuff on Ancient Anguish, a mud I used to frequent. The thing is, most muds don&#8217;t really have a system of government, much less a thought-trough way of dealing with trouble-makers, particularily not those who create trouble that cross over into the real world.</p>
<p>So, instead, it comes down to something approaching random chance; it depends on if the top deities are sane, or not.</p>
<p>If they know what&#8217;s good for the mud, they refuse to accept succh behaviour though, because as you point out, most muds are heavily male-dominated, which again means that the muds who -do- manage to have a female-friendly atmosphere, and thus more female players, get a lot more players of BOTH sexes.</p>
<p>More females, because of the friendlier atmosphere, and more males because many males will prefer playing in a more mixed environment. Win-Win if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3697</guid>
		<description>The second part of your comment -- was that to S. Miller or to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second part of your comment &#8212; was that to S. Miller or to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughingrat</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3696</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughingrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3696</guid>
		<description>Butbutbut...he&#039;s not a bad guy!  He&#039;s nice!  He&#039;s friendly!  ...At least, he&#039;s friendly to the right people.  And that&#039;s all that matters, right?

How many times have we heard that?  I recently had a male neighbor corner me and threaten me while I was in my car, for instance; when I mentioned to someone else that the guy had repeatedly behaved aggressively and finally escalated to violence, the person said, &quot;Yeah, but he&#039;s not a bad guy or anything.&quot;  Just what does it take for violent men to be recognized as &quot;bad guys,&quot; anyway?  What has to happen before people in their social networks drop them and stop protecting them?

To keep this all in one comment--re: your &quot;this doesn&#039;t just affect women&quot; remark, above, I am concerned that you felt obliged to capitulate to a PHMT argument.  Men don&#039;t have to be the victims of harassment or abuse in order for harassment and abuse to affect ALL of us.  We&#039;re in a situation where roughly 50% of the population abuses, or has social, legal, and economic latitude to abuse, the other 50% of the population.  That sounds like &quot;all of us&quot; to me, but I can say that without undermining the truth about women&#039;s marginalization under patriarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Butbutbut&#8230;he&#8217;s not a bad guy!  He&#8217;s nice!  He&#8217;s friendly!  &#8230;At least, he&#8217;s friendly to the right people.  And that&#8217;s all that matters, right?</p>
<p>How many times have we heard that?  I recently had a male neighbor corner me and threaten me while I was in my car, for instance; when I mentioned to someone else that the guy had repeatedly behaved aggressively and finally escalated to violence, the person said, &#8220;Yeah, but he&#8217;s not a bad guy or anything.&#8221;  Just what does it take for violent men to be recognized as &#8220;bad guys,&#8221; anyway?  What has to happen before people in their social networks drop them and stop protecting them?</p>
<p>To keep this all in one comment&#8211;re: your &#8220;this doesn&#8217;t just affect women&#8221; remark, above, I am concerned that you felt obliged to capitulate to a PHMT argument.  Men don&#8217;t have to be the victims of harassment or abuse in order for harassment and abuse to affect ALL of us.  We&#8217;re in a situation where roughly 50% of the population abuses, or has social, legal, and economic latitude to abuse, the other 50% of the population.  That sounds like &#8220;all of us&#8221; to me, but I can say that without undermining the truth about women&#8217;s marginalization under patriarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>I was reluctant to let this through because it kind of smacks of PHMT. For reference: http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/phmt-argument/

I think it serves well as a reminder. This stuff doesn&#039;t just affect the women -- it affects all of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reluctant to let this through because it kind of smacks of PHMT. For reference: <a href="http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/phmt-argument/" rel="nofollow">http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/phmt-argument/</a></p>
<p>I think it serves well as a reminder. This stuff doesn&#8217;t just affect the women &#8212; it affects all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Miller</title>
		<link>http://geekfeminism.org/2010/02/09/playing-with-womens-boundaries/comment-page-1/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfeminism.org/?p=2101#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>It seemed like MUDs always had cultures that were dominated by men with weird social issues.   Not only would they treat women badly, but they would pick on each other as well.  There were certain guys that were constantly getting mocked for reasons that were not clear.

It seemed like the ones with stricter roll playing rules did not fall prey to the drama as often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed like MUDs always had cultures that were dominated by men with weird social issues.   Not only would they treat women badly, but they would pick on each other as well.  There were certain guys that were constantly getting mocked for reasons that were not clear.</p>
<p>It seemed like the ones with stricter roll playing rules did not fall prey to the drama as often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

