Linkspamming into a brick wall (9th November, 2010)

If you have links of interest, please share them in comments here, or if you’re a delicious user, tag them “geekfeminism” to bring them to our attention (twitter uses can use #geekfeminism). Please note that we tend to stick to publishing recent links (from the last month or so).

Thanks to everyone who suggested links in comments and on delicious.

10 comments on this post.
  1. betsyl:

    a thing that many people who are analyzing wiscon’s statement seem to have missed is that it is a *draft* statement. as in still in progress.

    as a someone who works on wiscon and has for years, i’d like to point people to echidne, http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2010_10_31_archive.html#519289891583220862, who also analyzes the statement, and who violet socks does offer a pointer to.

  2. Mel:

    Wow, that’s an….interesting…take on intersectionality.

  3. Amanda:

    I was gonna say, after looking at that first link and starting at the commentary for sometime, I’m not happy with the ageism, anti-intersectionality and anti-3rd wavers going on. Whole lot of “young feminists get off my lawn and take your gay/PoC concerns with you!” going on. Ouch.

  4. Amanda:

    that’s *staring at, not starting…

  5. scube':

    some kick ass links in there – thanks!
    I enjoy the opportunity to see some new faces and great writing, and that was great.
    thanks again!

  6. Leigh Honeywell:

    Probably worth noting that linking to stuff in spams doesn’t necessarily mean we all agree with the things the links contain. Because yeah, that first link… while I get the sentiment, it’s so full of fail.

  7. Dorothea Salo:

    Yes, and some of the comments are worse. Worth putting an intersectionality fail warning on it? Especially with sentiment running high over the Moon GoH thing, some people might appreciate the notice.

  8. Carla Schroder:

    Wired Magazine’s cover has nekked boobies. Cindy Royal writes the best cancel-my-subscription letter ever:

    “Then, I turned you over to see what fascinating topics I would be delighted by this month. Boobs. Right there on the cover. A pair of breasts, no head, no rest of body… just boobs.”
    http://tech.cindyroyal.net/?p=790

  9. Mary:

    OK, added. (ETA: I agree the post and comments have major problems.)

  10. Mackenzie:

    I went with “wow, what’s wrong with Wired? Glad I don’t subscribe to that” when I saw it at the bookstore.