The Wednesday Geek Woman queue is currently empty! Keep this series alive: it would be great to get six to eight submissions to keep us going for a while. If enough submissions don’t come in, we will put what we have up but then we will put Wednesday Geek Woman on hiatus until August or so rather than keep nagging you.
Submit your profile of a geek woman in (hidden) comments here and selected ones will be posted (perhaps lightly edited) on Wednesdays. Here’s what to include:
- Optional: a quick one sentence bio paragraph about yourself, with any links you want. For example:
Mary is a humble geek blogger and you can find her at <a href="http://geekfeminism.org/">geekfeminism.org</a>Notes:
- if this bio line is missing, you will be assumed to want to be anonymous. This applies even if you put a name and URL in the comment field.
- don’t feel pressured into revealing things about yourself you don’t want to. A pseudonymous, mysterious, vague or simple bio is fine.
- Compulsory: two or more parapraphs describing your geek woman, ideally including why you admire her in particular.
- Optional: links to her biography, her Wikipedia page, and so on.
- Optional: agreement that your post can be used under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (posts that have this can be used in the Geek Feminism wiki).
See previous posts for examples.
Here’s a form you could copy and paste into comments:
My bio (one sentence only, optional):
Name or pseudonym of the geek woman I am submitting:
A few words summarising the woman’s geek accomplishments (for example “AI researcher” or “discoverer of supernova” or “engine mechanic”):
My post about this woman (two or more paragraphs):
Links to this woman elsewhere (optional):
[Please delete this line if you don’t agree!] I agree to licence my post under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.
Notes on things we do welcome:
- a broad definition of ‘geek’: crafters, writers, community organisers, scientists, hackers and creators all welcome
- profiles submitted by anyone, including men
- multiple submissions by the same person are fine, so if you submitted last time, or you’ve already submitted this time, no problem!
- famous geek women: no geek woman is too well-known for this series at this point (unless we’ve featured her before). If more than one person submits the same woman to this round, their profiles will be combined.
- we’d prefer living or historical women, fictional women will be occasionally accepted but won’t be the main feature
- it’s fine to profile a woman who uses a pseudonym
- you’re welcome to submit your writing that’s been published somewhere in the past (as long as you kept the copyright), for example, an Ada Lovelace Day post you made. If your piece has appeared at another URL, please give us that URL.
We may not publish your profile if it falls into these categories:
- there are lots of geek women past and present, so for now we will not be re-posting a woman subject who has already been featured. See previously posted women.
- profiles of women who don’t have some kind of public profile, which might include things like a public blog, a professional homepage with a professional bio, an academic homepage listing her publications, a Wikipedia page with her biography, may not be accepted. We don’t want to highlight someone who’d rather not have a Web presence.
- per How Not to Do Ada Lovelace Day, profiles of women focussed on them being a supportive life-helper to a man geek will not be accepted (collaborative geeking with men of course accepted)
- this really shouldn’t need to be said, but your post should be about the woman’s geeking, not about her appearance or personal life